Issue/PR comments (#512) and the issue/PR body (#710) are filtered to the
trigger timestamp so content created or edited after an authorized trigger
cannot be injected into Claude's prompt (TOCTOU protection). Reviews and
inline review comments were not: fetchGitHubData returned reviewData filtered
by actor only, and formatReviewComments renders it into the prompt, so a
review submitted or edited after the trigger reached Claude verbatim.
filterReviewsToTriggerTime already existed (added alongside the comment filter
in #512) but was only wired to the image-download list, never to the returned
reviewData.
Filter reviewData.nodes through filterReviewsToTriggerTime and each review's
inline comments through filterCommentsToTriggerTime, alongside the existing
actor filter, then build the review image-processing lists from those
already-filtered nodes (removing a now-redundant second filter pass).
Strengthen the two integration tests to assert post-trigger and edited-after
reviews/comments are dropped.
When a PR originates from a fork, `git fetch origin <branch>` fails
because the branch only exists on the fork's remote.
Fix: detect cross-repository PRs via the `isCrossRepository` GraphQL
field and fetch using `pull/<number>/head:<branch>` refspec instead,
which is the standard GitHub mechanism for accessing fork PR branches.
Changes:
- Add `isCrossRepository` and `headRepository` to PR GraphQL query
- Add corresponding fields to GitHubPullRequest type
- Branch checkout uses pull ref for fork PRs
- Update test fixtures with new fields
Co-authored-by: User <user@example.com>
- Introduced `include_comments_by_actor` and `exclude_comments_by_actor` inputs in action.yml to allow filtering of comments based on actor usernames.
- Updated context parsing to handle new input fields.
- Implemented `filterCommentsByActor` function to filter comments according to specified inclusion and exclusion patterns.
- Modified `fetchGitHubData` to apply actor filters when retrieving comments from pull requests and issues.
- Added comprehensive tests for the new filtering functionality.
This enhancement provides more control over which comments are processed based on the actor, improving the flexibility of the workflow.
* fix: use original title from webhook payload instead of fetched title
- Add extractOriginalTitle() helper to extract title from webhook payload
- Add originalTitle parameter to fetchGitHubData()
- Update tag mode to pass original title from webhook context
- Add tests for extractOriginalTitle and originalTitle parameter
This ensures the title used in prompts is the one that existed when the
trigger event occurred, rather than a potentially modified title fetched
later via GraphQL.
* fix: add title sanitization and explicit TOCTOU test
- Apply sanitizeContent() to titles in formatContext() for defense-in-depth
- Add explicit test documenting TOCTOU prevention for title handling
Add trigger-time validation for issue/PR body content to prevent attackers
from exploiting a race condition where they edit the body between when an
authorized user triggers @claude and when Claude processes the request.
The existing filterCommentsToTriggerTime() already protected comments -
this extends the same pattern to the main issue/PR body via isBodySafeToUse().
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Implement time-based filtering for GitHub comments and reviews to prevent
malicious actors from editing existing comments after Claude is triggered
to inject harmful content.
Changes:
- Add updatedAt and lastEditedAt fields to GraphQL queries
- Update GitHubComment and GitHubReview types with timestamp fields
- Implement filterCommentsToTriggerTime() and filterReviewsToTriggerTime()
- Add extractTriggerTimestamp() to extract trigger time from webhooks
- Update tag and review modes to pass trigger timestamp to data fetcher
Security benefits:
- Prevents comment injection attacks via post-trigger edits
- Maintains chronological integrity of conversation context
- Ensures only comments in their final state before trigger are processed
- Backward compatible with graceful degradation
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
